The weekend conversations were dominated by discussions surrounding the adjustments made to the CSI 300 and SSE 50 indices, with the latter taking the spotlight and even trending on social media. The changes weren't particularly controversial regarding the CSI 300 index, but the SSE 50 adjustments caught considerable attention, primarily due to the inclusion of notable stocks like Cambrian and Cerebrum. Cambrian, specifically, has been a blockbuster stock on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board, witnessing a staggering rise in share price from approximately 95 yuan in February to nearly 590 yuan today, reflecting an extraordinary fivefold increase in less than a year.

This meteoric rise inevitably raises questions about the sustainability of Cambrian's stock price within the booming context of the chip and artificial intelligence industries. Investors and analysts alike are perplexed; does such a surge indicate an overvaluation? While it's true that the stock has appreciated significantly, many in the market seem divided on how Cambrian's inclusion in the SSE 50 index will affect overall market performance. Some critics speculate that the move is an attempt to let passive index fund investors absorb the risk, although that perspective might be overstated. The SSE 50 index primarily consists of core assets, and while Cambrian's valuation raises eyebrows, it's unlikely to produce a decisive negative impact on the index as a whole.

Advertisement

This situation is reminiscent of a previous period when the stock Ningde Times, also facing high valuations, was added to the ChiNext index amid rising market enthusiasm. A reflection in hindsight would suggest that those circumstances ended with some twists and turns. While I support Cambrian's inclusion in the SSE 50 index—a clear sign of the index's need for tech components—I can't dismiss the unease surrounding its current market position.

What does this phenomenon reveal about the current market environment? The recent boom in passive indices is a topic of significant market interest, particularly the growing popularity of the CSI A500 index fund. Its size continues to expand aggressively, much like the CSI 300 ETF, which showed remarkable investor enthusiasm earlier in the year when market conditions were less favorable. Authoritative funds were making continuous purchases, reflecting a fervent belief in passive index investment strategies that seemed to reach fever pitch.

Yet, if these trends represent the surface, we must ponder what lies beneath. Despite the apparent enthusiasm and high inflow into the CSI 300, its performance has been rather mediocre, failing to outperform indices like the ChiNext 50 or micro-cap stocks. This data crystallizes a vital truth: the A-share market remains a battlefield of speculative activity, where inversely contrarian strategies often yield better returns. Investors may find that the most lucrative profits do not lie in chasing trends, thereby emphasizing the importance of independent analysis instead of following the herd.

In my assessment of the current market dynamics, I maintain a cautious stance on the suddenly popular CSI A500 index fund and have similar sentiments towards the CSI 300. The once-ignored indices like the ChiNext 50 and ChiNext 200 are now becoming intriguing grounds to explore potential investment opportunities. As the spotlight shifts, these lesser-known territories may contain hidden gems.

Another aspect worth noting is the fading enthusiasm for actively managed funds. Despite the market rally in October, we witness a declining trend in the scale of actively managed funds, juxtaposed against the continuous rise of index-based funds. Are we at a juncture where investors are reconsidering their alignment with prevailing trends? Observing whether active funds can outperform index counterparts in the coming months will be fascinating.

As the weekend unfolds, this wraps up our discussion. I often delve into stock talk, but I also find myself gravitating toward discussing funds, which I believe are easier to manage effectively. Given my own substantial holdings in numerous funds, I am eager to engage in deeper conversations on this subject matter in future discussions.

Disclaimer: The content within this article is for reference purposes only and does not constitute any operational advice or recommendations. The stock market carries risks; please invest cautiously!